Bâtir la confiance, garantir le succès Portail client dang.victor@worldsteelgroup.com +84 902 881 833
World SteelBuilding trust, Assuring success

Design & engineering

Seismic design

Seismic design of PEBs: hazard, site class, ductility factors, system choice and detailing under ASCE 7, NBC, AS 1170.4, NZS 1170.5 and EN 1998.

Mis à jour 3 min de lecture Voir dans le modèle 3D →

Steel portal frame building with arrows showing horizontal seismic forces at roof level
Earthquake ground motion produces inertia forces proportional to the building's mass.

How earthquakes load a steel building

During an earthquake, the ground moves and the building's mass resists that motion, producing inertia forces. For a light pre-engineered building with metal cladding the mass is small, so seismic forces are often lower than wind forces and wind governs the frames. Seismic design becomes critical where mass is high – concrete or masonry walls, mezzanine floors, heavy roof equipment, cranes – or where the hazard is high, such as the western United States, Canada's west coast, New Zealand, Japan, Turkey, Chile or Indonesia. Even when wind governs strength, seismic detailing requirements may still apply.

Diagram of seismic base shear and storey forces on a steel frame
Seismic base shear is distributed up the structure according to mass and height.

Code approach by region

Seismic design basis (simplified)
CodeHazard inputReduction for ductilityNotes
ASCE 7-22 (USA)Multi-period response spectra, SDS and SD1, site classResponse modification R, overstrength Ω0, deflection amplification CdSeismic Design Category A–F controls permitted systems and detailing (AISC 341-22)
NBC 2020 (Canada)Uniform hazard spectrum Sa(T), site designationDuctility Rd and overstrength RoCSA S16-19 Clause 27 defines steel system categories
AS 1170.4 (Australia)Hazard factor Z, probability factor kp, site sub-soil classStructural ductility μ and performance factor SpEarthquake Design Category I–III; most PEBs are low ductility
NZS 1170.5 (New Zealand)Site hazard spectra; TS 1170.5 based on the 2022 National Seismic Hazard Model is available as an alternative pathDuctility μ, SpDetailing per NZS 3404
EN 1998-1 (Europe)Reference peak ground acceleration agR, ground type A–EBehaviour factor qLow-dissipative (DCL, q ≈ 1.5–2) or dissipative DCM/DCH

Choosing the seismic system for a PEB

Two strategies are possible. In low-ductility design the frames are designed for higher forces with modest detailing requirements – for example "steel systems not specifically detailed for seismic resistance" with R = 3 (permitted in Seismic Design Categories A–C under ASCE 7-22), ordinary moment frames, NBC "conventional construction", μ ≈ 1–2 in AS 1170.4, or DCL in EN 1998. This usually suits light PEBs because wind already requires substantial strength. In ductile design lower forces are used but connections, member slenderness and bracing must meet capacity-design rules (AISC 341, CSA S16 Clause 27, NZS 3404, EN 1998). Tapered, thin-web members typical of PEB have limitations in high-ductility systems, so in high-hazard zones the system choice must be confirmed early.

  • Longitudinal direction: rod or angle bracing must meet code limits on slenderness and connection strength; tension-only rod bracing has restrictions in high seismic categories.
  • Connections in seismic force paths are often designed for overstrength (Ω0) forces.
  • Diaphragm action of the roof and anchorage of walls to the frame must be checked.
  • Drift must be checked with amplified deflections (Cd in ASCE 7-22) and limited per code.
  • Non-structural components (heavy services, mezzanine handrails, cladding) need seismic anchorage.

Seismic weight and where the forces act

Seismic force is proportional to the effective seismic weight – the mass that moves with the structure. For a PEB it is built up from the items below (ASCE 7-22 wording; other codes use similar rules with their own fractions):

Components of seismic weight in a PEB (US practice, simplified)
ComponentIncluded
Frames, secondary members, cladding, insulationFull dead load
Collateral loads (services, ceilings, sprinklers, solar arrays)Full permanent weight
WallsUpper half of wall height tributary to the roof level; concrete or masonry walls dominate the mass
Storage areasAt least 25% of the floor live load (with exceptions)
Partitions on floorsActual weight, or a minimum allowance where partitions are required
Snow20% of the flat-roof snow load where it exceeds 30 psf (1.44 kPa)
Permanent equipment, crane bridgesOperating weight; lifted load normally excluded

In a plain PEB most mass sits at roof level, so the base shear is applied at the eave. Mezzanines and crane bridges are applied at their own levels, which raises column moments and bracing forces. For single-storey steel moment frames in high seismic design categories, ASCE 7-22 permits ordinary moment frames only within height and roof and wall weight limits, which is one reason why concrete wall panels can force a change of system.

Seismic data needed at quotation

  1. Project location (coordinates) and governing code edition.
  2. Risk / importance category of the building.
  3. Geotechnical site class or soil class – this can change seismic forces several-fold.
  4. Masses: mezzanines, cranes, wall materials, roof-mounted equipment and solar panels.
  5. Preferred seismic system and any client or authority requirements.

World Steel's engineering team applies the destination code and states the seismic parameters and system on the drawings and calculations. Seismic combinations are described in design loads, and drift limits in serviceability and deflection. Connection detailing is covered in connection design.

Normes par région

RégionNormePérimètre
United States ASCE 7-22 Ch. 11–12Seismic design criteria and requirements for building structures
United States AISC 341-22Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings
Canada NBC 2020 Sec. 4.1.8Earthquake load and effects
Canada CSA S16-19 Cl. 27Seismic design requirements for steel structures
Australia / NZ AS 1170.4Earthquake actions in Australia
Australia / NZ NZS 1170.5Earthquake actions – New Zealand
Europe EN 1998-1Design of structures for earthquake resistance

Questions fréquentes

Does seismic or wind govern a typical PEB?

For light metal-clad buildings, wind usually governs strength. Seismic often governs buildings with mezzanines, cranes, heavy walls or roof equipment, and buildings in high-hazard zones.

Why does soil class matter?

Soft soils amplify ground shaking. Moving from rock to soft soil can multiply design seismic forces several times, so a geotechnical site classification is needed early.

Can tapered PEB frames be used in high seismic zones?

Yes, but system selection and detailing must follow the local seismic provisions. Many projects use a low-ductility system designed for higher forces; high-ductility systems impose limits on member proportions and connections.

Prochain projet

Un projet de structure métallique à l'étranger ?

Envoyez-nous vos plans ou votre maquette IFC – notre équipe de chiffrage vous répond avec le périmètre de fabrication, le planning et le prix rendu chantier.